There was a demo of the latest AI diagnostic tool. Impressive metrics – 97% sensitivity, 99% specificity.
Then someone asked: “What happens when it’s wrong?” The room went silent.
That silence? That’s where we need to start talking.
💡Join the conversation shaping the future of imaging AI at the Asia-Pacific Imaging Summit. Explore how leaders are responding to AI’s clinical challenges.
Current AI in clinical diagnosis operates as a black box – we know it works, but we can’t explain why. When a patient asks, “Why does the computer think I have cancer?” the honest answer is often: “We’re not sure.”
Deep learning in pathology can identify cellular abnormalities with superhuman precision. But these neural networks learn patterns too complex for human interpretation. The better the AI gets, the less we understand its decision-making process. ¹
This isn’t academic curiosity – it’s creating real problems in clinical settings right now.
That AI system spotting pneumonia faster than radiologists? It fails when presented with different scanner models or patient populations it wasn’t trained on.
Transfer learning in medical imaging shows incredible consistency in controlled environments, then crashes when encountering unusual staining protocols or rare conditions.
Real-world studies show lower accuracy than in labs—such as COVID-19 image-screening tools achieving just ~64% accuracy compared to 68% for radiologists. ²
🎯 Want to see how leaders are addressing these failures? Attend the Asia-Pacific Imaging Summit to explore practical solutions from clinical experts and AI developers.
Legal and regulatory mechanisms lag behind technological realities:
Risk Area | Key Questions | Current Status |
---|---|---|
Diagnostic Errors | Who’s liable when AI fails? | Legal precedents developing |
Data Bias | How ensure equitable performance? | Limited training diversity |
System Integration | What when AI conflicts with judgment? | No standardized protocols |
Smart specialties aren’t treating AI as infallible – they’re learning to work around limitations. Radiologists use AI as sophisticated screening while maintaining final authority.
Whole slide imaging and quality control tools are helpful when they work correctly. But they create new failure modes that didn’t exist in traditional workflows.
AI in healthcare is transformative and absolutely not bulletproof. The sooner we accept this, the sooner we can build systems that work reliably in actual patient care.
The question isn’t whether AI will make mistakes – it will. The question is whether we’re building healthcare systems that handle those mistakes gracefully and continue providing excellent care despite AI’s imperfections.
Patients don’t need perfect AI. They need healthcare systems that work reliably, practitioners who understand their tools’ limitations, and assurance that human expertise remains central to their care.
What’s your experience with AI limitations in healthcare? Share your insights – understanding these failure modes is crucial for everyone in this space.
✅ Join experts, clinicians, and tech leaders at the Asia-Pacific Imaging Summit to shape the future of AI in medicine—because acknowledging limitations is the first step toward building better, safer solutions.
³ Angelina Q, et al. A Structural Analysis of AI Implementation Challenges in Healthcare, 2025.
⁴ Alhasan A.J.M.S. Bias in Medical Artificial Intelligence, 2021.
Only products with same currency can be added to the basket. Clear the basket or finish the order, before adding products with another currency to the basket.